Ubuntu To Join Android And iOS In The Tablet Market

According to InfoWorld

Canonical is preparing a version of the Ubuntu OS for tablet computers as the company looks to extend its presence in the mobile space, a company executive said.

Tablets with the Ubuntu OS could become available late in winter 2011, said Chris Kenyon, Canonical’s vice president of OEM services. The OS will be a lightweight version of Linux with a simplified, touch-friendly user interface.

This is interesting coming from a company that reshaped the Linux desktop market. The tablet version will be based on Ubuntu 10.10 version. It will be interesting to see what kind of traction does Ubuntu tablet OS get compared to Android.


Case Study: Importance of Open Data

It is now well known how Open Data plays a vital role in creating an open society. There are many instances where open data has played a crucial role in ensuring fairness in a society. In a recent TED talk, Sir Tim Berners-Lee pointed out to various examples of mashups created using open data and particularly highlighted about government data and the role of open geo data in helping the earthquake ravaged Port au-Prince.

Now David Eaves, a public policy advocate and one who evangelizes strongly for Open Government Initiative, has put up a blog post offering a case study on the role played by open data in reducing the fraud under the name of charitable organizations. It is a great case study offering a glimpse of how open data coupled with Linus’ law on more eyeballs making bugs shallow, can help an open society. It is a great case study and I strongly recommend you to read the blog post.

In the computer world there is something called Linus’ Law, which states: “given enough eyeballs, all bugs (problems) are shallow.” The same could be said about many public policy or corruption issues. For many data sets, citizens should not have to make a request. Nor should we have to answer questions about why we want the data. It should be downloadable in its entirety. Not trapped behind some unhelpful search engine. When data is made readily available in machine readable formats, more eyes can look at it. This means that someone on the ground, in the community (like, say, Toronto) who knows the sector, is more likely to spot something a public servant in another city might not see because they don’t have the right context or bandwidth. And if that public servant is not allowed to talk about the issue, then they can share this information with their fellow citizens.

In US, after the current Obama administration took steps for opening up the government data, we saw how open data played a role in tracking how the stimulus money was spent. There are way too many examples of the role played by open data in promoting an open and fair society. It is time we demand open data in all facets of life.

Microsoft Signs Joomla Contributor Agreement

Microsoft has a love hate relationship with Open Source community. On one hand, it has realized that they cannot live without embracing open source strategically but, on the other hand, they cannot change their old habits. However, thanks to efforts by people like Sam Ramji and others, they are more open than anytime in the past. The following news caught my attention and I thought I will share it with the readers of this blog.

Read more of this post

Red Hat Takes Another Step Towards Cloud Computing

Redhat, the poster child of open source and maker of most popular Linux distribution in the enterprise market, took another step into the cloudy future. Redhat recently released version 5.5 of their popular Enterprise Linux distribution. They followed it up with an announcement focused mainly on the hybrid nature of the enterprise cloud adoption in the immediate future. Read more of this post

Songbird Discontinues Linux Support

Songbird, the free and open source Mozilla based media player, has decided to stop support for Linux platforms. Songbird is a versatile media player that works with modern web services like Last.fm, mashTape, Shoutcast, etc.. Being an open source media player, the announcement stopping support for Linux platforms is a bit shocking to many in the open source community. However, Songbird has announced that they are reprioritizing in order to focus on doing well on the remaining platforms. Read more of this post

Eucalyptus Systems Changes CEO – What’s Next?

On Friday, Eucalyptus Systems, the open source software powering the private clouds in the enterprises, announced that the former CEO of MySQL AB, Mårten Mickos, has taken over as CEO of Eucalyptus Systems replacing Woody Rollins who will now be their CFO. This has taken the entire industry by surprise. I am also equally surprised because I just spoke with the Eucalyptus team including Mr. Rollins on wednesday and I got no clue about their impending move. In this post, I will briefly talk about Eucalyptus Systems and what this move means to them. Read more of this post

Sam Ramji Joins Mindtouch Board

Sam Ramji, who spearheaded the open source efforts at Microsoft and currently with Sonoa Systems, has joined the board of Mindtouch Inc. (Disclaimer: Mindtouch is a Diversity Limited client). Mindtouch is a leading vendor in the collaboration space offering both open source and cloud version of their product. They have a mission to support open standards and Sam Ramji’s expertise on the board will help them in their mission. Congratulations to Mindtouch on this news. Read more of this post

OpenECP, An Enomaly ECP Fork

I am a strong supporter of Open Source Software and a proponent of the importance of open source in cloud computing. It is my strong opinion that open source will empower the customers giving them access to the software even after the company behind the product goes out of business. In this regard, I have even called Open Source as a SaaS endgame. Even though Open Source plays a predominant role in empowering the customers, there are some vendors who use open source as a pure marketing ploy. These vendors use open source to entice users to their product and as soon as they gain reasonable traction, they stop supporting the open source version of the product. Read more of this post

Open Source As A SaaS Endgame Debate

I have been advocating my theory on Open Source as a SaaS endgame for sometime now. My recent post on the topic quoting the example of Storytlr has kcik started a round of debate in the web. Matthew Aslett of 451 Group pointed out that releasing the SaaS application as Open Source doesn’t guarantee its success. Serdar Yegulalp of Information Week agrees with Matthew’s assertion and I also agree that any open source project (for that matter, any software) needs a vibrant vendor or developer community to succeed. In response to Matthew’s post, I clarified where I am coming from. My argument is that Open Source licensing of a SaaS application going down will ensure the business continuity of the users of the application. The author and Enterprise Irregular, Nenshad Bardoliwalla, pointed out to the SaaS Bill of Rights which states that when a SaaS provider goes out of business, their customers would be to receive a virtual machine image with the software configured as they have in the multitenant instance and with their data. This is definitely a good idea but, as I pointed out to Nenshad, the customer will be left in the lurch if something goes wrong with the software installed using VM. With an open source solution, the user has the option to hire a developer to fix any issues that arises later on. Read more of this post

Open Source As A SaaS Endgame – Digging A Bit More

I recently revisited my “open source as a SaaS endgame” theory quoting a news about another web app releasing their code under an open source license before shutting down the shop. As I do with many of my posts here in Cloud Ave, I was wearing my evangelist hat and it resulted in the crux of the post getting hyped up a bit. It appears to have given an impression that I am predicting the SaaS app to flourish if it had an open source endgame.

Matthew Aslett, of 451 Group who writes the CAOS Theory blog, disputes this and makes a very important point.

with open source there is life after death – if there is a committed group of developers prepared to put in the effort to keep the project alive. For many open source projects that’s a pretty big “if”.

Read more of this post

Open Source As A SaaS Endgame – Storytlr Joins The Elite Group

Many societies believe in the idea of Afterlife. As far as the human life is concerned, I do not believe in this supernatural concepts. However, when it comes to software “lives”, I believe in eternity (a life without death). I believe that a software can live eternally without the death faced by the lesser mortals, by adopting open source licensing model. A proprietary software dies mostly with the company or with the ones that acquires the original company. However, open source software, even if it is tied to a particular company, does not die with the company. It is usually cloned or forked and developed by volunteers or another company interested in solving the problems for a niche group of customers. As long as there is an itch in the hands of at least a handful of users, open source software will continue to live. Even if no one is interested in a particular open source software, it will continue to live in one of the open source repositories waiting to be consumed by some soul sometime in the future. This is clearly not the case with proprietary software. In short, my argument is that if the software is released as open source, it can still be useful even after the developer(s) or company behind the software vanish in thin air. Read more of this post

Redhat Trying To Differentiate Themselves From Forks And Third Party Support Services

The beauty of Open Source is that the customers are not tied or locked into a single vendor. For example, customers can use any Linux distribution and take support from third party support services companies. Plus, anyone can take the source code of any open source software, do some customizations and offer it as a clone with their own branding. CentOS is an example of such a strategy. It is also possible for companies to take a particular OS distribution and fork from it to develop their own Linux distribution and bundle services on top of it. Canonical and Ubuntu can be considered as an example for this. Read more of this post