logo
  • Entries
  • Comment
  • Popular
Recent Posts
  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)...
  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)...
  • Sam Ramji Joins Mindtouch Board...
  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)...
Recent Comments
  • Krishwords ...
  • Tony Perez For the sake of conversation, I wil...
  • Preetham Dear Krish , Please go ...
  • Phillep The only cooperation either open so...
Popular Articles
  • A decentralized social networking platform (40)
  • Tech media doesn't get open source (38)
  • Nicholas Carr has got it wrong. Open Source follows Bazaar model and it is democratic (31)
  • Proprietary software is from dark ages (26)
  • Home
  • About

Much Ado About Nothing

Posted by krishnan in Open Source on 05 21st, 2009 | Comments

Logo Open Source InitiativeImage via Wikipedia

Yesterday, tech blogosphere was buzzing about the Belgian Open Source developer Bruno Lowagie of Ghent’s plans to restrict certain users from using the software he developed. The gist of the story is as follows. The developer of iText, an open source Java library which helps manipulate PDF, RDF, HTML, etc. on the fly. The developer has some personal problem with the Belgian Government and he now wants to restrict the Belgian government agencies from using the software by adding a term in the license. The software is released under Mozilla Public License and LGPL right now.

Pundits are worried about the impact of such a move by the developer because this library is also embedded into other popular Open Source projects like Eclipse BIRT, Jasper Reports, etc.. They are worried that the additional restriction will prohibit Belgian authorities from using any of the Open Source software that uses this library. There are also worries about what if this becomes a trend and the potential havoc such a trend will cause in the software community.

In my opinion, these fears are overrated. The biggest advantage of Open Source licenses over proprietary licenses is that the developer or the company behind an Open Source product lose some of the control once the software is released in the wild. This offers an easy solution to the above problem. Fork, Fork, Fork. If this library is so important and if it is used by many big Open Source projects, there will be many developers who are willing to offer their time to develop the code further. If the original author runs wild, anybody can just take the code in its current form and just fork the project. They can then keep the software under an Open Source license without any draconian restrictions. This is the beauty of Open Source. No single developer or company can restrict anyone from using a particular piece of software. It is important that Open Source users (and developers) understand this unique feature of Open Source and go ahead with the life without worrying about issues that doesn’t matter the community.

Related articles by Zemanta
  • michael arrington: Open Source Developer Intends To Block Belgian Government From Using His Technology Over Tax Dispute (techcrunch.com)
blog comments powered by Disqus

Categories

  • Data Portability
  • Federated Clouds
  • General
  • Industry News
  • Linux Apps
  • Open Clouds
  • Open Government
  • Open Media
  • Open Source
  • Open Standards

Archives

  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • October 2006
  • August 2006

Recent Posts

  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)
  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)
  • Sam Ramji Joins Mindtouch Board
  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)
  • What Is Hot In Open Source? (weekly)

Recent Comments

  • Alvin Ashcraft on Sam Ramji Joins Mindtouch Board
  • OpenECP, An Enomaly ECP Fork | CloudAve on Time to stop the abuse of the term Open Source
  • OpenECP, An Enomaly ECP Fork | Open@Krishworld on Time to stop the abuse of the term Open Source
  • Exploring the World of Online Personal Health Records | SOA Governance - Service Oriented Architecture - SOA Business - SOA Design - SOA Services - SOA Software - SOA Solutions - SOA Security - SOA Web Service on Online Personal Health Records: My thoughts
  • Exploring the World of Online Personal Health Records | Summa Blog on Online Personal Health Records: My thoughts

Tag Cloud

Advocacy Amazon Blackberry books Canada Capitalism Cloud Computing Data Portability eBooks Editor endgame Epub Facebook Free software GlassFish Healthcare India iText Kindle Krish Recommends Licenses Linux Microsoft Mindtouch Mobile Open Cloud Open Data open formats Open Government Open Protocols Open Source Opensource Open Standards Proprietary Software Redhat Research In Motion Richard Stallman SaaS Sam Johnston Social Networks Software as a service Sun Microsystems True Nature Vancouver WYSIWYG

My Tweets

My Open Source Bookmarks